Inline base64 source maps had been checked into tracked src files. This strips those comments from the repository without changing runtime behavior or adding ongoing guardrails, per the requested one-time cleanup scope.
Constraint: Keep this change limited to tracked source cleanup only
Rejected: Add CI/source verification guard | user requested one-time cleanup only
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: narrow
Reversibility: clean
Directive: If these directives reappear, fix the producing transform instead of reintroducing repo-side cleanup code
Tested: rg -n "sourceMappingURL" ., bun run smoke, bun run verify:privacy, bun run test:provider, npm run test:provider-recommendation
Not-tested: bun run typecheck (repository has many pre-existing unrelated failures)
This follow-up pass continues the phased unused-code cleanup from issue #314 with four dialog components that shared the same low-risk pattern: avoidable unused imports, dormant Props aliases, and untyped callback plumbing that only existed as compiler noise. The changes keep behavior intact while reducing the next layer of cleanup friction.
Constraint: Keep the second pass narrowly scoped and homogeneous so it stays easy to review beside PR #316
Rejected: Fold in EffortCallout and wider component cleanup at the same time | larger surface area and less uniform risk profile
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: narrow
Reversibility: clean
Directive: Continue batching future passes by shared cleanup pattern; leave broader refactors and compatibility placeholders for separate PRs
Tested: bun run build; bun run smoke; targeted noUnused grep for touched files via bun x tsc --noEmit --noUnusedLocals --noUnusedParameters --pretty false
Not-tested: full repo typecheck (broader baseline noise remains outside this pass)
Co-authored-by: anandh8x <test@example.com>
Squash the current repository state back into one baseline commit while
preserving the README reframing and repository contents.
Constraint: User explicitly requested a single squashed commit with subject "asdf"
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: broad
Reversibility: clean
Directive: This commit intentionally rewrites published history; coordinate before future force-pushes
Tested: git status clean; local history rewritten to one commit; force-pushed main to origin and instructkr
Not-tested: Fresh clone verification after push
