* chore: rebrand user-facing copy to OpenClaude
Replace lingering Claude Code branding in CLI, tips, and runtime UI with OpenClaude/openclaude, including the startup tip Gitlawb mention.
Co-Authored-By: Claude GPT-5.4 <noreply@openclaude.dev>
* chore: address branding-sweep review feedback
- PermissionRequest.tsx: rebrand the two remaining "Claude needs your
approval/permission" notifications to OpenClaude (review-artifact and
generic tool permission paths).
- main.tsx, teleport.tsx, session.tsx, WebFetchTool/utils.ts,
skills/bundled/{debug,updateConfig}.ts: replace leftover `claude --…`
CLI hints and "Claude Code" labels missed by the original sweep.
- main.tsx: drop the inline gitlawb.com marketing copy from the
stale-prompt tip; keep it a pure rebrand.
- auth.ts: finish the half-rename so both `claude setup-token` and
`claude auth login` references in the same error block now read
`openclaude …`.
- mcp/client.ts: keep `name: 'claude-code'` for MCP server allowlist
compatibility (now explicit via comment) and replace the
"Anthropic's agentic coding tool" description with an OpenClaude one.
- MCPSettings.tsx: point the empty-server-list hint at
https://github.com/Gitlawb/openclaude instead of code.claude.com.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* chore: replace help link with OpenClaude repo URL
Replace https://code.claude.com/docs/en/overview with
https://github.com/Gitlawb/openclaude in the help screen.
Co-Authored-By: OpenClaude <openclaude@gitlawb.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude GPT-5.4 <noreply@openclaude.dev>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: OpenClaude <openclaude@gitlawb.com>
Inline base64 source maps had been checked into tracked src files. This strips those comments from the repository without changing runtime behavior or adding ongoing guardrails, per the requested one-time cleanup scope.
Constraint: Keep this change limited to tracked source cleanup only
Rejected: Add CI/source verification guard | user requested one-time cleanup only
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: narrow
Reversibility: clean
Directive: If these directives reappear, fix the producing transform instead of reintroducing repo-side cleanup code
Tested: rg -n "sourceMappingURL" ., bun run smoke, bun run verify:privacy, bun run test:provider, npm run test:provider-recommendation
Not-tested: bun run typecheck (repository has many pre-existing unrelated failures)
Co-authored-by: anandh8x <test@example.com>
The login picker previously sent third-party users to a dead-end info screen
that only mentioned env vars. This change reuses the existing provider wizard
from the login flow so first-run setup can continue without requiring slash
command access first.
Constraint: The existing provider setup logic must remain the single source of truth
Rejected: Build a separate third-party auth wizard in ConsoleOAuthFlow | would duplicate provider setup behavior and drift over time
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: moderate
Reversibility: clean
Directive: Keep third-party onboarding routed through ProviderWizard unless the provider command flow is intentionally redesigned
Tested: bun test src/components/ConsoleOAuthFlow.test.tsx src/commands/provider/provider.test.tsx
Tested: tsc --noEmit via project diagnostics
Not-tested: Live gh-authenticated push and PR creation path
Co-authored-by: anandh8x <test@example.com>
The /login platform_setup screen only listed Amazon Bedrock,
Microsoft Foundry, and Vertex AI — OpenAI-compatible providers
and Gemini were completely absent, leaving users with no guidance
on how to use OpenClaude's main feature.
Changes:
- Selector label: "Amazon Bedrock, Microsoft Foundry, or Vertex AI"
→ "OpenAI, Gemini, Bedrock, Ollama, and more"
- Description updated to mention OpenAI-compatible providers and Gemini
- Added OpenAI and Gemini env var instructions to the docs list
Fixes#43 (login screen confusion for Gemini users).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Squash the current repository state back into one baseline commit while
preserving the README reframing and repository contents.
Constraint: User explicitly requested a single squashed commit with subject "asdf"
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: broad
Reversibility: clean
Directive: This commit intentionally rewrites published history; coordinate before future force-pushes
Tested: git status clean; local history rewritten to one commit; force-pushed main to origin and instructkr
Not-tested: Fresh clone verification after push
