This is a small prose-only follow-up that rewrites clearly internal or
explanatory Anthropic comment language to neutral wording in a handful of
high-confidence files. It avoids runtime strings, flags, command labels,
protocol identifiers, and provider-facing references.
Constraint: Keep this pass narrowly scoped to comments/documentation only
Rejected: Broader Anthropic comment sweep across functional API/protocol references | too ambiguous for a safe prose-only PR
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: narrow
Reversibility: clean
Directive: Leave functional Anthropic references (API behavior, SDKs, URLs, provider labels, protocol docs) for separate reviewed passes
Tested: bun run build
Tested: bun run smoke
Tested: bun run verify:privacy
Tested: bun run test:provider
Tested: bun run test:provider-recommendation
Not-tested: Full repo typecheck (upstream baseline remains noisy)
Co-authored-by: anandh8x <test@example.com>
This pass rewrites comment-only ANT-ONLY markers to neutral internal-only
language across the source tree without changing runtime strings, flags,
commands, or protocol identifiers. The goal is to lower obvious internal
prose leakage while keeping the diff mechanically safe and easy to review.
Constraint: Phase B is limited to comments/prose only; runtime strings and user-facing labels remain deferred
Rejected: Broad search-and-replace across strings and command descriptions | too risky for a prose-only pass
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: narrow
Reversibility: clean
Directive: Remaining ANT-ONLY hits are mostly runtime/user-facing strings and should be handled separately from comment cleanup
Tested: bun run build
Tested: bun run smoke
Tested: bun run verify:privacy
Tested: bun run test:provider
Tested: bun run test:provider-recommendation
Not-tested: Full repo typecheck (upstream baseline remains noisy)
Co-authored-by: anandh8x <test@example.com>
Inline base64 source maps had been checked into tracked src files. This strips those comments from the repository without changing runtime behavior or adding ongoing guardrails, per the requested one-time cleanup scope.
Constraint: Keep this change limited to tracked source cleanup only
Rejected: Add CI/source verification guard | user requested one-time cleanup only
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: narrow
Reversibility: clean
Directive: If these directives reappear, fix the producing transform instead of reintroducing repo-side cleanup code
Tested: rg -n "sourceMappingURL" ., bun run smoke, bun run verify:privacy, bun run test:provider, npm run test:provider-recommendation
Not-tested: bun run typecheck (repository has many pre-existing unrelated failures)
Co-authored-by: anandh8x <test@example.com>
Squash the current repository state back into one baseline commit while
preserving the README reframing and repository contents.
Constraint: User explicitly requested a single squashed commit with subject "asdf"
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: broad
Reversibility: clean
Directive: This commit intentionally rewrites published history; coordinate before future force-pushes
Tested: git status clean; local history rewritten to one commit; force-pushed main to origin and instructkr
Not-tested: Fresh clone verification after push
