* feat: activate coordinator mode in open build
Enable the COORDINATOR_MODE feature flag and create the missing
src/coordinator/workerAgent.ts module that provides worker agent
definitions for the coordinator.
Coordinator mode is a multi-agent system where a coordinator agent
orchestrates independent workers via AgentTool, SendMessageTool,
and TaskStopTool. The implementation was already 99% complete
(19KB coordinatorMode.ts, 26 gate sites across 15 files) — only
the workerAgent module was missing from the source snapshot.
Workers get the standard built-in agents (general-purpose, explore,
plan). The coordinator system prompt (252 lines) handles all
orchestration logic.
Activate at runtime: CLAUDE_CODE_COORDINATOR_MODE=1
Optional scratchpad: set {"tengu_scratch": true} in
~/.claude/feature-flags.json (#639)
* fix: add worker agent type for coordinator mode
The coordinator system prompt instructs the model to spawn workers with
subagent_type: "worker", but no agent had agentType === 'worker'.
This caused AgentTool to throw "Agent type 'worker' not found" on
every coordinator spawn attempt.
Add a WORKER_AGENT definition that spreads GENERAL_PURPOSE_AGENT with
agentType: 'worker'. Also use the narrower BuiltInAgentDefinition type.
* feat: activate built-in explore and plan agents in open build
Enable BUILTIN_EXPLORE_PLAN_AGENTS so Explore (fast, haiku, read-only)
and Plan (architect, read-only) agents are available to all users in
both normal and coordinator modes.
This resolves the inconsistency flagged in code review: coordinator
workers had access to Explore/Plan agents while normal sessions did not.
The GrowthBook A/B test gate (tengu_amber_stoat) defaults to true via
the no-telemetry stub. Users can disable via feature-flags.json (#639).
* Remove internal-only bundled skills and mock rate-limit behavior
This takes the next planned Phase C-lite slice by deleting bundled skills
that only ever registered for internal users and replacing the internal
mock rate-limit helper with a stable no-op external stub. The external
build keeps the same behavior while removing a concentrated block of
USER_TYPE-gated dead code.
Constraint: Limit this PR to isolated internal-only helpers and avoid bridge, oauth, or rebrand behavior
Rejected: Broad USER_TYPE cleanup across mixed runtime surfaces | too risky for the next medium-sized PR
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: moderate
Reversibility: clean
Directive: The next cleanup pass should continue with similarly isolated USER_TYPE helpers before touching main.tsx or protocol-heavy code
Tested: bun run build
Tested: bun run smoke
Tested: bun run verify:privacy
Tested: bun run test:provider
Tested: bun run test:provider-recommendation
Not-tested: Full repo typecheck (upstream baseline remains noisy)
* Align internal-only helper removal with remaining user guidance
This follow-up fixes the mock billing stub to be a true no-op and removes
stale user-facing references to /verify and /skillify from the same PR.
It also leaves a clearer paper trail for review: the deleted verify skill
was explicitly ant-gated before removal, and the remaining mock helper
callers still resolve to safe no-op returns in the external build.
Constraint: Keep the PR focused on consistency fixes and reviewer-requested evidence, not new cleanup scope
Rejected: Leave stale guidance for a later PR | would make this branch internally inconsistent after skill removal
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: narrow
Reversibility: clean
Directive: When deleting gated features, always sweep user guidance and coordinator prompts in the same pass
Tested: bun run build
Tested: bun run smoke
Tested: bun run verify:privacy
Tested: bun run test:provider
Tested: bun run test:provider-recommendation
Not-tested: Full repo typecheck (upstream baseline remains noisy; changed-file scan still shows only pre-existing tipRegistry errors outside edited lines)
* Clarify generic workflow wording after skill removal
This removes the last generic verification-skill wording that could still
be read as pointing at a deleted bundled command. The guidance now talks
about project workflows rather than a specific bundled verify skill.
Constraint: Keep the follow-up limited to reviewer-facing wording cleanup on the same PR
Rejected: Leave generic wording as-is | still too easy to misread after the explicit /verify references were removed
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: narrow
Reversibility: clean
Directive: When removing bundled commands, scrub both explicit and generic references in the same branch
Tested: bun run build
Tested: bun run smoke
Not-tested: Additional checks unchanged by wording-only follow-up
---------
Co-authored-by: anandh8x <test@example.com>
Squash the current repository state back into one baseline commit while
preserving the README reframing and repository contents.
Constraint: User explicitly requested a single squashed commit with subject "asdf"
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: broad
Reversibility: clean
Directive: This commit intentionally rewrites published history; coordinate before future force-pushes
Tested: git status clean; local history rewritten to one commit; force-pushed main to origin and instructkr
Not-tested: Fresh clone verification after push
