Neutralize internal Anthropic prose in explanatory comments (#357)
This is a small prose-only follow-up that rewrites clearly internal or explanatory Anthropic comment language to neutral wording in a handful of high-confidence files. It avoids runtime strings, flags, command labels, protocol identifiers, and provider-facing references. Constraint: Keep this pass narrowly scoped to comments/documentation only Rejected: Broader Anthropic comment sweep across functional API/protocol references | too ambiguous for a safe prose-only PR Confidence: high Scope-risk: narrow Reversibility: clean Directive: Leave functional Anthropic references (API behavior, SDKs, URLs, provider labels, protocol docs) for separate reviewed passes Tested: bun run build Tested: bun run smoke Tested: bun run verify:privacy Tested: bun run test:provider Tested: bun run test:provider-recommendation Not-tested: Full repo typecheck (upstream baseline remains noisy) Co-authored-by: anandh8x <test@example.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2641,7 +2641,7 @@ let suppressNext = false
|
||||
const FILTERED_LISTING_MAX = 30
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Filter skills to bundled (Anthropic-curated) + MCP (user-connected) only.
|
||||
* Filter skills to bundled + MCP (user-connected) only.
|
||||
* Used when skill-search is enabled to resolve the turn-0 gap for subagents:
|
||||
* these sources are small, intent-signaled, and won't hit the truncation budget.
|
||||
* User/project/plugin skills (the long tail — 200+) go through discovery instead.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user